Forum:Logo proposal

Forum: Home > Logo proposal

Previous blabla HERE.

Our current logo. Look at it. No, shht, don't touch... it's fragile. Just look at it. See those colours. Just, focus on it. Yes, it needs to be changed, this one NEEDS to be changed. Why, would you ask? Well, the quality sucks. It is a disgrace that such of low-quality simple thing is still appearing on every page! Look at those borders! Look at it! It needs to be fixed, or even better: pimped.

Well, one day later than planned, but here it is: the Great Voulez-vouz Votez avec nous? - voting about the new logo for UnMeta. Well, new... a better one. Here are the Nominees:

• To vote, pick the number of the logo you prefer, and post it below.
• 

  1 - Current yellow one

• 

  2 - Yellow with a gradient

• 

  3 - Yellow with a border and shadow

• 

  4 - Yellow with shine and a dark shadow

• 

  5 - Yellow with a gradient and shine

• 

  6 - Current Uncyclomedia logo

• 

  7 Wikimedia colours

• 

  8 - Wikimedia colours and pattern

• 

  9 - Meta pacman

• 

  10 - Potato

• 

  11 - Wikimedia logo

VOTE!

• Corruptees, sockpuppets, amoebas, Cubans^*, Lao-people^*, North Koreans^* and eels are prohibited to vote. At least have an account, and 25 non-reverted edits (ignore this rule if you're international). The voting kills itself ends on 20 december.
• You may vote 2 times, of course 1 vote per image.

_{^* When they are able to vote, they may vote, but after the other following rules.}

1	2
... ...	... ...
3	4
... ...	Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | | No. 5 is too dark, too orange... I definitely prefer this one. However this is my second choice | 22:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC) ...
5	6
Roye7777777 ~ Talk 15:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC) I prefer, as SVG being, but I like 4 better for it's concept. I prefer the colour-use to be more yellow than orange and the balance (spacing, scaling) between text and logo seems better to me on 4. This is not Wikimedia. The orange, howeber, is just so it has more contrast and is less of an eyesore, and three of my four monitors agree that solid yellow is an eyesore. It's like harmonics. Pure tones suck, but mix different harmonics and then you have nice happy sounds. ~ 20:45, 13 December 2011 Alzheimlich (talk) and two others like this 22:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC) For. -- Sir Zombiebaron (talk) 19:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC) -- Vox 22:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)	Roye7777777 ~ Talk 19:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC) 2nd choice ...
7	8
... ...	This is the best version of the original Uncyclomedia logo more faithfully Wikipedia copied. Rhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 1833 preppiedits 13:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC) The Bard of UnMeta 14:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC) ...
9	10
Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | | This is the Meta-concept which we must use. The green color might be a bit boring or too unsuitable for a packman, so perhaps combining no. 4 with this one would be a nice one | 17:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC) Dis one. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC) -- Vox 00:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC) Mjbmr (talk) 10:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC) The Bard of UnMeta 14:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC) ...	For. -- Sir Zombiebaron (talk) 19:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC) ...
11
... ...

Blabla-corner

Something had to stand right over here. Roye7777777 ~ Talk 16:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

If UnMeta and Uncyclomedia are 'different' things with different logos, perhaps this should be for the logo for Uncyclomedia, not for UnMeta? I mean, Uncyclomedia is the pacman. UnMeta is just something that happened and never really got a logo of its own, and since Wikimedia meta doesn't use the wikimedia logo either... I assumed they were the same since the domains all came here, see, but if they're not perhaps this should be two votes, one for UnMeta and one for our imaginary Uncyclomedia. ~ 20:45, 13 December 2011

Uncyclomedia Foundation is not fictional. It's real and it has $$$$!!!!! Cartoonist | Spit it out ^(talk) | E-mail | | 23:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

For those who don't know what to vote (there're always), ask yourself the question: do you want a parody on the Wikimedia-logo, with same colours, only an other setup, or a parody of the Wikimedia-logo with an own identity? Roye7777777 ~ Talk 18:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

2nd voting

• Voting about no. 5 and 9
• All registered users are allowed to vote one time
• Deadline December, 23 at 21:00 (CET, Europe)/15:00(ECT, Brazil)

Logo 5

1. -- Vox 23:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
2. Roye7777777 ~ Talk 14:57, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Logo 9

1. Cartoonist | Spit it out ^(talk) | E-mail | | 21:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

If so

I declare that Logo 5 (even without my vote, de jure) has won, and has become eligible to become our new logo. Roye7777777 ~ Talk 23:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC)