Forum:Daemonica

From Uncyclomedia, the UnMeta-wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Forum: Home > Daemonica

Who wants to adopt Daemonica? Any volunteers? You will get sysop permissions for it, no obligations!

Alicia Keys and Bubbles Green will not loose their rights | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 19:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

People who want to take over Daemonica

Talk space

I'd like to ask, why not this shelter project is distinctive Uncyclopedia and Illogicopedia but the differences between the humor in this proposed site. Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2080 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 20:55, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I think Dæmonica is a kind of mix between Uncyclopedia and Illogicopedia. Let's say: an encyclopaedia where everything should be funny. I know, it's vague... Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 22:49, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Is it wrong to say that it's worse then Illogicopedia? Roye7777777 ~ Talk 11:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Why not BALEET this wiki, and move its articles as a namespace of an existing wiki? It saves work, increases the number of articles of an existing wiki, saves resoures, saves admin time to fight spam, etc. Cthulhu.fhtagn (talk) 17:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
In a way, there's spam attacks, typical of those suffered Uncyclomedia wikis. :D Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2080 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 18:13, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Close down the site? Really, if I were Carlb, I would give up the site and delete its content. Personally, I don't see the sense of Daemonica. Another advantage of deleting the site is indeed the fact that we won't have any concerns anymore. Less is more, but it's not up to me to decide that | Cartoonist @ 193.191.150.2 09:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Close the site really solve it? And what would you say Alicia and Bubbles about it? I think first of all, they should decide whether the project is worth to them. If both decide to continue the project, we have no alternative but to support them against spam attacks. Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2080 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 22:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
  • I was not suggesting a simple shut-down of the site, but moving it to a namespace of an existing wiki. A random sample of its 5000 articles shows that most of them are just an image with a label. The few exceptions are some very funny articles with blasphemies against Islam (like the article about Mecca). Ok, maybe this kind of humor is not suited to Uncyclopedia-in-wikia (Jimbo probably would censor the blasphemies in fear of being the target of a fatwa) or Illogicopedia, so there's no other place to keep them except in Daemonica itself. Cthulhu.fhtagn (talk) 22:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
I know, but I don't really see the sense of it in its current state. We should upgrade the wiki by choosing another concept of humor. Something different than Uncyc or Illogic. Daemonica is a good name, but it deserves better content | Cartoonist | Spit it out (talk) | E-mail | UnMeta | 12:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
I don't think it's necessary to choose another concept of humor, since they are explicity satanic in the way they present the pages: it's Portal to Hell (the Portal), Pandaemonium, Random torment (random page), ''Beyond help (help), Satanic pages (special pages), and so on. The problem is that they don't keep up with this satanic/blasphemous humor, take, for example, article Portugal, a minimum with a truth-value of 99% that is neither fun nor satanic nor blasphemous. Cthulhu.fhtagn (talk) 14:42, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Oh yeah I'm one of the site admins, for the record a lot of the site is fan cruft and not worth salving anyway. But I'm willing to continue admining the site of it can get some contributors. I am able to delete the spam more regularly these days, now my exams are over. Frosty (talk) 04:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
I deserve to hear this kind of thing... another thing, anyone remember that the Daemonica has articles (unnecessarily, speaking) identical to the deceased Crappypedia? And we also see that the Crapédia (apparently) by the style of papers is similar to the rough style of the Daemonica? Rhubella beach.jpgRhubella Marie, the rat sockpreppie 2080 preppieditsRhubella.jpg 23:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Personal tools
View and edit namespaces data

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Reports and requests
Community
Contact
Toolbox